<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>I concur with this response. <br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On Aug 12, 2014, at 6:42 AM, "Steven Solomon" <<a href="mailto:ssolomon@cap.gov">ssolomon@cap.gov</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><font color="#000000">I'm in Las Vegas now for the National PAO Academy being offered today and tomorrow, having just finished up two weeks as a Cadet Officer School flight instructor at Maxwell AFB Base. I see that there has been much discussion the last few days about the revised PAO Specialty Track released on July 25. I strongly urge that comments and suggestions go through the chain of command in order to be considered official, but I'd like to address the concerns that have been raised on this forum. </font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div><div><font color="#000000">It had been 14 years since the track was issued, so an update was long </font><font color="#000000">overdue. Many CAP PAOs, including SER PAO Jeff Carlson, were extremely anxious that the PA track be updated, especially because the A4/6 (formerly </font><font color="#000000">AFIADL and before that ECI) CAP Public Affairs Officer 02010 correspondence course was no longer available, had not been replaced, and was still required to satisfy the CAPP 201 Technician Rating (3d) requirement.</font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div><div><font color="#000000">So a National Level PA Working Group approved by the National CC, consisting of NATCAPWG PAO Lt Col Paul Cianciolo, ILWG PAO Lt Col Paul Hertel and RMR PAO Lt Col Al Nash, made recommendations that NHQ/PA Deputy Director of PA Julie Debardelaben, myself, and SWR PAO Lt </font><font color="#000000">Col Arthur Woodgate polished. Col Bryan Cooper, National Professional Development Officer, and Bobbie Tourville, NHQ Professional Development Chief, completed the project. </font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div><div><font color="#000000">As I privately told SDWG PAO Maj Bruce Kipp, who started the discussion on this list-serve, our thinking is that CAP PAOs/PIOs are being assigned to increasingly complex and challenging missions, often alongside other federal agencies, and need to be NIMS compliant like our counterparts because even though we are all volunteers and not paid, we need to be as professional as the professionals we are being deployed to work alongside. </font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div><div><font color="#000000"><font color="#000000">We offered G-289 yesterday here in Las Vegas before the two-day National PAO Academy, and are planning on offering G-290 next year. The registration</font> fee for the E-388 course at the Emergency Management Institute in </font><font color="#000000">Emmitsburg, Md. is waived for CAP members, and transportation costs are also covered. So, taking E-388 is actually easier than taking Region or National Staff College, both of which are required for advancing through the CAP professional development process.
</font></div><div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div><div><font color="#000000">In the end though, it is up to every CAP officer to decide what track and what level they pursue. I can't speak for whomever succeeds me in my national position someday, but I suspect that the requirements will only get harder as we continue to study and accept the public affairs strategies and tools constantly being developed. In my opinion, it's an ongoing process.
</font></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr"><font color="#000000">
</font><div><font color="#000000">Regards,</font></div><font color="#000000">
</font><div><font color="#000000">Steven</font></div><font color="#000000">
</font><div><font color="#000000"> </font></div><font color="#000000">
</font><div><font color="#000000"> </font></div><font color="#000000">
</font><div><font color="#000000">STEVEN SOLOMON, Lt Col, CAP</font></div><font color="#000000">
</font><div><font color="#000000">National Public Affairs Officer<br>Civil Air Patrol National Headquarters<br>105 South Hansell St., Building 714<br>
Maxwell AFB AL 36112-5937</font></div><font color="#000000">
</font><div><a href="mailto:ssolomon@cap.gov" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">s</font></a><a href="mailto:ssolomon@cap.gov" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:ssolomon@cap.gov" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">solomon@cap.gov</font></a></div>
<font color="#000000">
</font><div><font color="#000000">Cell: </font><a href="tel:240-505-6279" target="_blank" value="+12405056279"><font color="#000000">240-505-6279</font></a></div><font color="#000000">
</font><div><font color="#000000"> </font></div><font color="#000000">
</font><div><em><font color="#000000">
</font><p><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"><font color="#000000"><image001.jpg></font></span></span></p>
<font color="#000000">
</font><p><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"></span><font color="#000000">... Citizens Serving Communities</font></p></em><font color="#000000">
</font><p><u></u><font color="#000000"> </font><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Civil-Air-Patrol/107647995924164" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt;text-decoration:none"><font color="#000000"><image001.png></font></span></a><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"><font color="#000000"> </font></span><a href="https://twitter.com/civilairpatrol" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt;text-decoration:none"><font color="#000000"><image002.png></font></span></a><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"><font color="#000000"> </font></span><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/civilairpatrol/collections/" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt;text-decoration:none"><font color="#000000"><image003.png></font></span></a><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";font-size:9pt"><font color="#000000"> </font></span></p>
<font color="#000000">
</font></div><font color="#000000">
</font><div><u></u><font color="#000000"> </font></div><font color="#000000">
</font><p><span style="font-size:9pt"><u></u></span></p><font color="#000000">
</font><p><font color="#000000"> </font></p></div></div><font color="#000000">
<br><br></font><div class="gmail_quote"><font color="#000000">On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:25 AM, lockit3 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lockit3@att.net" target="_blank">lockit3@att.net</a>></span> wrote:<br></font><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">
<font color="#000000">
</font><div lang="EN-US" vlink="purple" link="blue"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">You have both stated the case well. This is why we must realize the PAO and PIO jobs ARE very different. Also, this is why the new FEMA course requirements should be part of moving through multi-level PIO ratings not PAO ratings. We have multi levels for GMT and not for PIO, yet we feel that PAO’s can do the PIO job.<u></u><u></u></font></span></b></p>
<font color="#000000">
</font><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14pt"><u></u><font color="#000000"> <u></u></font></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">Thank you,<u></u><u></u></font></span></b></p>
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14pt"><u></u><font color="#000000"> <u></u></font></span></b></p><font color="#000000">
</font><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14pt"><u></u><font color="#000000"> <u></u></font></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><font color="#000000">Curtis “Wayne” Hooks 1st Lt.<u></u><u></u></font></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><font color="#000000">Civil Air Patrol<u></u><u></u></font></b></p><font color="#000000">
</font><p class="MsoNormal"><b><font color="#000000">FLWG Online Newsfeed Manager<u></u><u></u></font></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><font color="#000000">Group 1 Public Affairs Officer<u></u><u></u></font></b></p><p class="MsoNormal">
<font color="#000000">
<b>Group 1 Recruitment and Retention Officer<u></u><u></u></b></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><font color="#000000">Tallahassee Composite Squadron<u></u><u></u></font></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000">
<b>Ser FL-432</b><b><u></u><u></u></b></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><font color="#000000">Public Affairs Officer<u></u><u></u></font></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000">
<b>Recruitment and Retention Officer<u></u><u></u></b></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14pt"><u></u><font color="#000000"> <u></u></font></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14pt"><u></u><font color="#000000"> <u></u></font></span></b></p>
<font color="#000000">
</font><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14pt"><u></u><font color="#000000"> <u></u></font></span></b></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";font-size:10pt"><font color="#000000">From:</font></span></b><span style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";font-size:10pt"><font color="#000000"> </font><a href="mailto:cap-pao-bounces@lists.sempervigilans.org" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">cap-pao-bounces@lists.</font><font color="#000000">sempervigilans.org</font></a><font color="#000000"> [mailto:</font><a href="mailto:cap-pao-bounces@lists.sempervigilans.org" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">cap-pao-bounces@lists.</font><font color="#000000">sempervigilans.org</font></a><font color="#000000">] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Alice Mansell<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, August 12, 2014 4:21 AM<br><b>To:</b> </font><a href="mailto:wweiler@flwg.us" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">wweiler@flwg.us</font></a><font color="#000000">; CAP Public Affairs Officers<br><b>Subject:</b> [Bulk] Re: [PAO] New CAPP 201 - Public Affairs Officer Specialty Track<u></u><u></u></font></span></p>
<font color="#000000">
</font><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u><font color="#000000"> <u></u></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000">Wow, Bill! You articulated so many fabulous thoughts on the deeper issue.<br><br>Absolutely agree with all you wrote, especially the need for different PIO ratings. I, also, have worked in JICs with military, federal agency, and state government information officers. Some random thoughts from those JICs:<br>
<br>- The CAP golf shirt works there the best. Any white aviator shirt gets too many confused reactions and to wear the USAF style uniform, one must truly meet military weight and grooming standards to have rapport with any military personnel present who can be a daily shifting cast of people.<br>
<br>- In JICs, once trusted by the lead informaton officer, a CAP member may end up doing as much work to get the word out for "other" agencies as our own, even for just internal CAP use. Whatever the incident commander thinks is the main messaging is more important than CAP ringing its own bell during a real mission or exercise with field operations.<br>
<br>- It is truly fun to work in JICs..... but they can be a steep learning curve in situations where it might take 5+ hours for every agency-stuck-in-silos to approve press releases. CAP should be able to delegate "our" such approvals to regionally approved PIO3s who can train, mentor, and/or supervise PIO2s and PIO1s.<br>
<br>I recall well how my Wing was one of the first to make sure only the most vetted and experienced mission coordinators (ICs now) were allowed to run real missing aircraft missions...and how it can take years to earn that duty assignment by consistently demonstrating quality skills in difficult situations. The days of a mission PIO being whatever warm body is willing to write a paragraph or talk to the press should stop.<br>
<br>-Alice<br><br><br><br>On Monday, August 11, 2014, Bill Weiler CAP <</font><a href="mailto:wweiler@flwg.us" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">wweiler@flwg.us</font></a><font color="#000000">> wrote:<br>> Some great ideas and valid complaints have been posted here, but we've danced around one of the real problems I see as an IC, PIO, and PAO.<br>
><br>> We have 3 levels of ICs, and with the diverse missions we conduct, 1 level of PIO just doesn't make sense to me. An IC3 can do ELT missions, SAREXs, and a multitude of small missions, but if it's a REDCAP or multi-agency mission an IC2 is required. A PAO with a little basic training can be PIO for a local SAREX or even a simple ELT mission, and learn a lot about 1/3 of CAP's mission while helping the local unit and team. The current PIO requirements are completely inadequate for a REDCAP or a Deepwater Horizon, and I spent weeks in the JIC at Mobile and Tallahassee for Deepwater. The only non-CAP classroom training for the current PIO is a local FEMA weekend course that shouldn't be too hard for any PAO/PIO candidate to attend, and it's a great networking opportunity with both the local media and ES community. Make the current basic PIO course a PIO 2 and make that the only PIO requirement for a PAO Master Rating with no additional FEMA training that most non-PIO PAOs don't need. A Master Rated PAO should understand the role of a PIO and what's entailed, but may not be well suited to ever serve as a PIO in a critical mission. The experience will help them help the PIO if needed and will help the local unit.<br>
><br>> With 40+ years experience in the ES community doing PAO/PIO work, gaining the trust and respect of other PIOs and ICs at a JIC is easy working side by side with them. Also being an IC helps. I've had a much more difficult time gaining the trust and authority I need for big missions from our own chain of command and organization - along with the AF. I can't say I blame them considering how elementary our PIO qualification currently is, and how many people with the qual are not ready for prime time. If we add the FEMA 200 and 300 PIO courses to a PIO 1 qualification, along with a few other requirements, we'll ensure that a PIO 1 can step into any mission without needing constant handholding, will truly know what can and cannot be said, and will be part of the JIC/IC team able to get the CAP story out real-time.<br>
><br>> Long before the term PIO was conceived, in 1969, I was the face for a multi-fatality snow slide, and I've done dozens of serious and fatal plane crashes since then with the sheriff and even FAA and NTSB asking me to be part of the media QA team. Now, when invited by the FEMA and USCG members of a JIC to be part of a media event I had to decline because the CAP chain required 48-72 hour advance notice and a review of what might be discussed before being authorized to be part of the event - that was called at the last minute. Maybe I've gotten that bad over the years, but I really think it's because we don't have an internal way of proving some PIOs are experienced enough and well trained enough to do their job unless they're personally known or micromanaged.<br>
><br>> Being a PIO is not some binary yes or no you can do it. It is something that takes considerable experience and training for the big jobs, but can easily be learned and mastered for the small missions. FEMA has multiple levels of PIO, so we should too. We need many more basic PIOs to help out, but we need a few Master Level PIOs just like FEMA has. We need more, not less, Master Rated PAOs that aren't discouraged from the task because of excessive PIO requirements they do not want to be directly involved in.<br>
><br>><br>><br>> Bill Weiler, Maj CAP<br>><br>> Florida Wing Civil Air Patrol<br>><br>> </font><a href="tel:913.488.5392" target="_blank" value="+19134885392"><font color="#000000">913.488.5392</font></a><br>
<font color="#000000">><br>> FLCAP 218<br>
><br>> </font><a href="mailto:wweiler@flwg.us" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">wweiler@flwg.us</font></a><br><font color="#000000">><br>><br>><br>> ______________________________</font><font color="#000000">__<br>
> From: "DOUGLAS E. JESSMER, Lt Col, CAP CAP/PM" <</font><a href="mailto:djessmer@cap.gov" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">djessmer@cap.gov</font></a><font color="#000000">><br>
><br>> Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 7:56 PM<br>><br>> To: "CAP Public Affairs Officers" <</font><a href="mailto:cap-pao@lists.sempervigilans.org" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">cap-pao@lists.sempervigilans.</font><font color="#000000">org</font></a><font color="#000000">><br>
><br>> Subject: Re: [PAO] [Bulk] FW: New CAPP 201 - Public Affairs Officer Specialty Track<br>><br>><br>><br>> All:<br>><br>> I've been following this discussion with great interest, as it goes to the heart of how we communicate to pretty much every constituency. Fact is, emergency services is one of our three main missions. How can we be effective in telling the CAP story if we don't have some background in what's probably our highest-profile purpose?<br>
><br>> I don't believe every public affairs officer should need to be a public information officer. And they don't have to be, but those PAs who don't want the FEMA courses and the PIO qualification can stop with the technician level of the track. Those who want the PIO training but can't get to Emmitsburg can go as far as the senior level. I'm sure Emmitsburg is nice this time of year — it's got to be less muggy than it is here in Florida. And if you want the training and to climb the ladder of the specialty track and lay low on the ops side, that's up to you. CAP is, after all, a volunteer organization.<br>
><br>> But every PIO should be a PA. And every public affairs officer should at least have a 101 card and some PIO training. Not to have that is to neglect a very important part of what is CAP. We aren't a pure-play emergency services organization, but people know us for that, at least the ones who know us. (And that's another thing — many would-be "customers" for our ops folks still don't know who we are! We need to market ourselves better in that regard....) We aren't just a cadet-program organization. And public affairs officers are in the best position to explain the three sides of CAP — they're not "the ops side and everyone else," but rather, the emergency services, cadet program and aerospace education missions with which Congress chartered us back in the day (PLs 476 and 557). A good PA needs to be well-versed in all three components.<br>
><br>> The most important thing in PIO training for CAP members is to learn how to play well with other agencies. CAP's PIOs won't be the lead on any incident, but we still stand to get our message out, and we must have the discipline of messaging to "stay in our lane" and work as part of a greater system. If Deepwater Horizon didn't teach us that, I don't know what will. We need to be team players, all up and down the line. Squadron PAs play as vital a role in our missions as do wing PIOs and the national staff. <br>
><br>> There's not really much else I can say that hasn't been said. Yes, these are the requirements. If there's widespread issue, I imagine adjustments may be made (that's just me speaking from my experience, not saying anything official by any means). We still need to be realistic while we're stretching the field, after all. But what's most important is that we want our public affairs officers to be the best they can be, to be able to capably, competently and confidently tell our story, and to position CAP favorably in our populaces.<br>
><br>><br>><br>> DOUGLAS E. JESSMER, Lt Col, CAP<br>><br>> National Marketing Officer<br>><br>><br>><br>> COM: </font><a href="tel:%28727%29%20480-9606" target="_blank" value="+17274809606"><font color="#000000">(727) 480-9606</font></a><br>
<font color="#000000">
><br>> Clearwater, Fla.<br>><br>><br>><br>> CAUTION: This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Do not disseminate this message without the sender's approval. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. <u></u><u></u></font></p>
<font color="#000000">
</font></div></div></div></div><br><font color="#000000">______________________________</font><font color="#000000">_________________<br>
Subscribed Email Address: </font><a href="mailto:ssolomon@cap.gov" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">ssolomon@cap.gov</font></a><br><font color="#000000">
CAP-PAO mailing list<br>
</font><a href="mailto:CAP-PAO@lists.sempervigilans.org" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">CAP-PAO@lists.sempervigilans.</font><font color="#000000">org</font></a><br><font color="#000000">
</font><a href="http://lists.sempervigilans.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-pao" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">http://lists.sempervigilans.</font><font color="#000000">org/mailman/listinfo/cap-pao</font></a><br><font color="#000000">
<br></font></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>